We Approach the Singularity In Rainbows: A Few Songs Before the Lights Go Out

Radiohead has long occupied the privileged role of an unfiltered cultural node, a point of entry into mainstream culture for ideas or artistic forms associated with the perimeter. They are enormously popular, however their subject matter is, in controversion to that popularity, oddly unsettling, their vaguely expressed themes the more eerie for being unexpressed. They are a pop supergroup statistically, but not artistically. They digest the themes indigestible to the masses and pass them on to an audience that gladly accepts what would under other circumstances be anathema to it. Thematically, the isolation, frightening anonymization, and abstracted control exerted on modern life by hidden processes, both technological and political, and the combination of those forces to negate identity are not exactly grist for Anne Geddes. But this is what people across the spectrum soak up when they tune in.

On Kid A, the band emerged from their post- OK Computer silence with an album of undeniably electronic music, in the genre sense, in spite of the electronic genre being largely unaccepted outside of its cadres of enthusiasts. On the track Idioteque They sampled Princeton’s Paul Lansky’s first computer composition from 1973, “Mild und Leise”, and also a work from the same compilation entitled, “Short Piece”, by Arthur Krieger. Not only did they succeed in creating an album of highly popularly regarded IDM, but they also, by sampling such early experimental works, extended a pop audience’s acceptance of experimental electronic music from the present back to its very historical roots.

Wendy Carlos may have succeeded in the ‘60s and ‘70s in proving to the public that electronic instruments were fit to play culturally sanctioned classics, but Radiohead succeeded after the turn of this century in pop-culturally sanctioning the entire history and intrinsic possibility of electronic music itself from its inception into perpetuity.

Other bands have emerged in the last 10 or so years to grow along similar trajectories to Radiohead. There are two American analogs: Those chairmen of the American Id, Chicago’s Wilco, and Oklahoma City’s The Flaming Lips. Radiohead has developed in divergence from Wilco out of realistic necessity. Though both bands are experimental with access to an enthusiastic fan base that would be critical of its work under different circumstances, as Europeans, Radiohead lack the ability to access folk forms available to the American artistic palate. They have moved away from further exploration of the rock and folk genres, developing instead toward the technologically sanctioned realm of electronic instrumentation and the European tradition of classical arrangement. With respect to Radiohead’s developing distaste for recording the sound of instruments played in purely acoustic space, the band can be said to have embraced a similar path to the Lips, who have adopted an increasingly laptop-couture form of heavily offline-processed-and-produced psychedelia.

It is possible, and fitting to mention in light of the new record’s content, that soon stylistic forensics will become meaningless. Each reader of this article could just as well demand an audience for the recording they just completed on the computers they are sitting before, either denying conversation entirely in the demand for recognition for him or herself or by citing influences from such a convoluted roster of similar inspirations that common references become pointless to find. However, inventing circuitous genealogies of influence seems to be the record reviewer’s bread and butter, so we’ll proceed. The 2-D vocal sound prevailing on this record, the result of separate tracks getting compressed down to their essences and then played back with the expectation that you should perceive the components as a whole, is reminiscent of My Bloody Valentine’s 1991 Loveless, with its wall of painted voices, and Brian Eno’s recent record, 2005’s warmly artificially atmospheric Another Day on Earth. The slow development of In Rainbows’ songs from quiet arpeggios into epic flourishes, not to mention the theme, has a forbear in Gary Numan’s 1980 Heroin-thick loss of humanity Euro-epic Telekon.

What the band laments on the new record is the loss of identity brought about by hypertrophied individuality. That loss, in a Gary Numan-esque twist, ironically is topical today because of the almost mechanically automated assertion of identity across many fronts- we write blogs that are search-engine-indexed immediately, our personalities are powered by identically formatted Myspace profile talking points and visually located on a map on our Flickr profiles, and our bill-pay services ensure our credit-entity counterparts can pay our bills independent of any action taken on our part. Where are we amidst our pre-formatted dating profiles and mechanized bills that accrue and pay themselves?
Continue reading “We Approach the Singularity In Rainbows: A Few Songs Before the Lights Go Out” →

And There it Was


Welcome to Borough Hall, Brooklyn, site of the Brooklyn Book Festival.  I was hoping to walk out of here with a few new titles, but nothing caught my pocketbook.  Not for lack of trying.  A bunch of vendors peddling their angles and their politics.  The quarterlies uniformly opaque to the outside observer without some deep involvement with the bound texts, and the publishing houses preaching to their niches.  A few independent authors were on hand, also, pushing their get-rich-quick scheme tomes or their identities in prole-lit form.

Still, it was good to get out and see a new part of the city and crackle in the energy which was abundantly present and pleasant on this suddenly cool early autumn day.

Steffi Rostenkowski Names the Devil

For there were no such things as they desired.
Yet the nameless lusts obsessed their senses no less fiercely for being phantoms: the quick young men were driven by phantoms as furiously as by any real and namable desire. … To Steffi, the terror of them lay in this: that they went to work and joked and lived sensibly with their mothers and saved their money and married and grew conservative and cared for their health by day, while practicing, all their lives by night, the madnesses of the streets as though their madnesses were the reward of being virtuous by day. … She heard them speaking innocently of innocent things; yet heard always, behind their voices, the tone of men locked in for life. They too were doing time on a bum rap: not one would be paroled.

When she wakened, she held a picture in her mind of another place: A great stone penitentiary with all the exits barred, and no sign of smoke or disorder without, no sound of crackling flame; but only the steady murmur of the machine shops within. Guards paced the wall steadily and regularly so that no one in the whole outside world could guess that the tiers within were blazing, tier upon tier within the very stone, that the smoke was in the lungs of a thousand chained men. That the very bars they grasped were melting within the stone.

There was no horror in the quick young men, no named or nameless horror. And in this lay the girl’s own dread. In this, to Steffi, lay their greatest unnaturalness: that they spoke of the unnatural, and acted unnaturally, as though it were all so natural. For in this they became alien to her own humanness. She did not fear their depravities, she could protect herself against those; but against a lack of humanness she had no defense. It was something beyond her feeling and understanding, and when she sensed such a lack she feared the man as she would fear a monster.

-Nelson Algren, “Never Come Morning”, Four Walls Eight Windows 1987, pp. 216-217

Steffi R., downtrodden female protagonist of Nelson Algren’s 2nd Novel, Never Come Morning, names for Algren the forced and then repressed break between the human and the inhuman in American manhood first, and through its effects the rest of American life. She sees and recoils, consciously and in dream, from the cycle of public morality and practice that pits a man against himself in the public space, so that all frustration with privation and the constant need to competitively fend it off is mislaid and addressed instead to the construct of vice. Steffi is a new whore who discovers that there is no bottom to the limits of depravity of men, nor any hindrance to the natural stride it will be taken in. Like the do-right daddies in New Orleans described in Algren’s A Walk on the Wild Side, rich captains of political office and public decency and the common schlemiels like those moving in and out of the house Steffi R. works in alike need the ban on vice in order to violate it. Rich or poor, no one finds pleasure except in the construct of vice, violation of imagined rules, committing of “sins”. In the end no one finds pleasure at all, for it’s back to work for the working stiff in the morning to recoup the losses and gain ground. It’s back into the straitjacket of keeping up appearances for the moneyed gentry.

Sin and want are the twin dynamos of society, and Algren was able to voice this by giving us the human, circuitously reflective inner lives of the irredeemable poor. Sin and want demand more of the same. To sin, you must have lines to transgress. You must have full prisons of subjects to scapegoat, subjects who want, unreflectingly, what the city fathers appear to have and want never to sit behind bars again. People who will come out of those prisons and, in their hunger, make real the divide. People with nothing to lose and not enough sense to not use violence to take what they want, people who will necessitate the cycle.

And it continues so today, playing out in the bizarre case of the senator from Idaho. Publicly you must decry that which you take most pleasure in privately. The problem here being that, as Algren’s friend Vonnegut said, you become what you pretend to be. You really do lose your job if you’re caught trespassing against made-up convictions.

Does anyone remember the scandal that broke out momentarily over the fake reporter planted in the president’s press conferences, the fellow under an assumed name who could also be found online featured in pornography that violated the avowed party line on a certain form of sexual deviance?

If we had Algren with us today, such a load of grist we’d have for his mill, what?

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Sots-Anarcho-Enviro-Responsibility Transport Casserole / No Burning Bush, Only Talking Leaves / Pining for a Binding / The Knights ADSR Templar

Of note today are these:

Sots-Anarcho-Enviro-Responsibility Transport Casserole
The New Yorker Festival will occur over the weekend of October 5, 6, and 7. The highlights are myriad, but of particular note is the event hosted by David Byrne on Saturday night, entitled “How New Yorkers Ride Bikes.” How this whole thing will be carried off is as yet unclear, but it will somehow involve “talks and performances” by a troupe of antique bicycle enthusiasts who, regardless of nativity, are currently from Brooklyn, oration from an architectural scholar, and the winter carnival that is a chorus of the elderly from Massachusetts. That is, it will include these among contributions from other characters partnered up to spoke the wheels of one common cause or another, all mediated and emceed by the personage of Mr. David Byrne in the service, possibly, of his chosen theme. That theme, again, is “How New Yorkers Ride Bikes”.

I saw David Byrne give the 2005 Marshall McLuhan Lecture at NYU’s Kimmel Center Auditorium, entitled “I (Heart) PowerPoint”. It was a very enjoyable experience. The reason for this stemmed from Byrne’s rather spacey and bemused style of exposition, the funny and subversive uses he both documented and to which he encouraged people to put normalizing technology such as PowerPoint (then the subject of a controversy surrounding its purported ability to make people with jobs “dumber”), and the hilarious antics of the McLuhanist Academy there assembled to pompously attempt to rake the guest speaker over the coals and embers cooling in the niches of their particular philosophical hearth. One good fellow demanded that Byrne construct a Mcluhanist tetrad of Media Effects for the program PowerPoint, presumedly to show that Byrne was a rock star who was not qualified to stand up in front of a bunch of McLuhanists telling them about their business. Byrne did not know what a tetrad is. The academy would be saved, their jobs would be safe.

Another pair of younger audience members were more excited to see their musical idol perform than to really get their heads around the idea of dissident uses of homogenizing and socially stratifying technologies. In addition to tittering at and along with Byrne’s occasionally rambling and tee-hee-ing discourse like schoolgirls willing to throw brassieres, these two asked if Byrne wouldn’t spend the remaining time he had available on-stage composing a new artistic PowerPoint presentation for their eager voyeuristic pleasure. He obliged, until it became uncomfortable and the lecture was ended.

With a lineup like the one he’ll have at his disposal, I can’t wait to see what sort of antics are prompted and what stuntmen ignited, unrehearsed. The members of the Young@Heart Chorus are none of them younger than 73. Do these guys even have their doctor’s consent to ride a bike? Tickets are $16.

No burning bush, only talking leaves.
This Sunday, 9/16, the Brooklyn Book Festival is taking place at Brooklyn Borough Hall, Borough Hall Plaza, Columbus Park, the Brooklyn Historical Society, and St. Francis College. I came across this looking for articles about Nelson Algren, and I was led to the festival from the front page of the National Book Foundation (said foundation having given Algren the first National Book Award for The Man With the Golden Arm). Like the New Yorker Festival, this looks to have a lot of discussions and presentations with writers, the difference being that this is earlier and it’s all free. There will also be a shitload of booksellers and publishers on hand. I’m going to be incurring papercuts from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.

Pining for a Binding
I stumbled onto a possibly useful site this morning while shopping for books – biblio.com. It’s a used and out-of-print 3rd-party book reseller marketplace. I’m not sure if you’ll find a much different selection or price range than on other resellers, but you never know when a resource like this could come in handy.

The Knights ADSR Templar
The Moog Foundation has announced that it has organized the first Moogfest Symposium at Columbia University on September 20, a panel discussion launching in coordination with the annual Moogfest being held at B.B. King’s in NYC on September 22. The symposium is happening at the Computer Music Center at Columbia University, and features synthetic music pioneer Gershon Kingsley, Moog Synthesizer development collaborator Herbert Deutsch, Electronic Music Foundation President Joel Chadabe, John Eaton, Trevor Pinch, and David Borden. The solder flies and the pots are panned at 8 PM.

The tickets to Moogfest are $45, and Thomas Dolby is playing. As near as I can tell, the Moogfest Symposium is as free as America- but no music, professor.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Two Upcoming Events of Note: Carsten Nicolai at Kitchen 10/6 and Moools at Don Pedros 9/26 and Knitting Factory 9/28

Something to look forward to while murdering precious living moments.

Heretofore mentioned experimental electronic exhibitionist Carsten Nicolai will be performing at New York’s Kitchen on October 6.  Tix are $15 bucks.  A friggin’ steal.

Tokyo’s good-times absurdo-hilarious rockers Moools will be bringing their inter-song banter and poppy rock guitar ditties to New York City in late September.  They’re at Don Pedro’s 9/26 and Knitting Factory 9/28.  I don’t know how much this costs, but it’s probably worth it.  Pretend you’re important enough to be anywhere else and you’ll just have to reckon with yourself while you’re taking those last rites, won’t you?

Technorati Tags: , , ,

signal | ROBOTRON

I first heard of Carsten Nicolai, 1/3 of the trio comprising the group signal, a few years ago when I went to see an installation of his work in a small art gallery (the name of which I cannot now remember) in Tokyo. All I remember is that it was located somewhere near Harajuku on the Satsujin Dori. This was in 2001 or 2002, and was one of the first times I had been exposed to granular synthesis.

You can read all about it in any number of places, but the idea behind granular synthesis is that sound is the illusion produced when the brain perceives millions of static sound particles in succession and “animates” them into a whole. Granular synthesists work with miniscule granules of sound, exploiting their traits of onset, decay, pitch, and frequency to build their compositions. It’s a big part of what makes glitch music “glitch”, but it also has a lot of applications that wouldn’t be associated with anything alien-sounding. You can produce a number of audio processing effects with granular synthesists, from reverb to resonance, and it might pass by the notice of your ear as a natural, expected, and transparent environmental trait of the sound.

Carsten Nicolai, operating under monikers Alva-Noto, Noton, Noto, and a few others in addition to his given name that I don’t have background on to list here, does not compose music that sounds like a natural, transparently-produced sound occurring in the environment. This is meticulously sequenced pops, clicks, throbs, and hums. If it were to stop there, though, this would be nothing more than a cheap gimmick. It does not stop there.

He is joined here by fellow Raster-Noton label-founders Frank Bretschneider and Olaf Bender, two musicians who, like Carsten Nicolai, began working in Iron Curtain East Germany and who also have always worked to emphasize the junction of the visual with the audible in their work. Olaf Bender designs the graphics for the Raster-Noton label in addition to his composition work, and Bretschneider operates under the musical alias Komet. What makes the fruit of their collaboration more than the gimmick of odd sounds comprising rude music is that it not only exploits the occasionally surprising musicality of odd and unnatural butt-ends of whole sounds or completely artificial sounds of extremely, at first listen, tonelessly short duration, but that it also exploits the way our granular perception of sound applies to larger pieces of music and collections of noise. It only takes a minute to acclimate before you find your head bobbing to the hypnotic rhythms pulsing in the hiss and static, and it doesn’t take too many more to catch yourself wondering if some of the sounds you’re hearing in your headphones are coming from somewhere outside the few centimeters traversing your ear canal. If you’ve gotten too confident in your prediction of the patterns in the noise, you’ll be surprised quite a few times by noises that don’t mesh environmentally with the rest of the composition. Clouds of hiss that fade in and seem to echo out as though they were echoing in a room in the real world might fool you into thinking they have to abide by real-world physics. But the point is that this music was not produced in an environment. Your brain, in its never-ending quest to make things easier for you, might relax having built that model of behavior. But when a new sound, higher pitched or not in phase with the way other sounds appear to be decaying in the artificial environment of this music, makes itself audible, the whole experience falls out of kilter.

This music is as much an exercise in unlearning listening habits as it is an opportunity to enjoy new sounds. It’s as much a display of conceptual and technical talent and a love for music on the part of the musicians as it is an experiment in dealing not only with the particulate aspects of the granularity of sound, but the spatial and perceptual aspects, as well. It pairs clicks and hums and clouds of static to make resonant micro-melodies hidden away in “backgrounds” as well as beats. It distances some relationships between the perceived aspects of space between other sounds and pairs other aspects of nearness and distance in ways listeners may not have learned to hear.

You can take a listen here:
http://www.bleep.com/player/?/RN69/111519/maxiplus/D3F9D3/575757/00D126

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,